Environmental issues in port competitiveness

Ports were also asked about which stakeholders expressed an interest in their EMS program and the type of certification. For example, the construction of offshore oil ports would keep large tankers, and potential oil spills, away from the coasts.

The importance of ports Foreign trade helps drive economic growth. Such improvements have been implemented or are planned at many U.

In all cases, respondents indicated that environmental performance was not included in commercial and marketing portfolios to any. In addition, the international nature of terminal management implies that policies adopted in one jurisdiction may spread through many more — global problems, need global solutions.

No document with DOI

Indeed, ample technology is available that can help avert accidents and optimize traffic flow, but capital and operating funds have proved scarce. Finally, there is more work to be done as regards the implications of this analysis, and of specific groups of environmental performance initiatives, for the deployment of strategic port management, as well as for the organisational structures of each port.

This is particularly true in the United States, which leads all nations in value of imports and exports. This market has fueled a trend toward larger and faster ships that make precisely timed and efficient port connections in order to achieve maximum cost-effectiveness and competitiveness.

The final determination included the following five groups: The bank can make and issue bonds, guarantee loans and make and accept grants. Busiest North Canadian Perform. This problem is liable to cause birth defects or even fertility problems.

The balance of the survey dealt specifically with various factors related to the environmental initiatives, activates and performances, and the attitudes towards these factors on the part of the respondents.

With this expansion has come increases in pollution, sometimes in dramatic fashion, as with massive oil spills, but more often in more subtle but no less threatening ways. This partnership concept is a promising way of fostering consensus and distributing costs.

Furthermore, most of these studies emphasized on the impact of port development and overlooked what factors influence sustainable port development. Today science and environmental technologies provide guidance but finding 2 Potential a cost-benefit analysis methodology will be used during the second phase to investigate and rank the merit and success of difference drivers during the decision process for achieving improvements in environmental performance.

Similarly, ultrafast moderate-size cargo ships are being designed, creating a need for new docking facilities. Attempts to limit improve the quality of marine fuels used by ships have resulted both in legislative initiatives but also in considerations of environmentally differentiated port dues, with a by-product being the popularity of clean marine award, for ports that promote low-emission shipping.

For example, it is no longer necessary to locate ports in densely populated areas, where land is the most expensive and there are many competing demands for space, access, or even the view. The impact of losing such critical transportation routes might be imagined by visualizing American life without the interstate highway system.

U.S. Seaports: At the Crossroads of the Global Economy

However, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA lacks the funds to tackle this job, and funds are limited for port-specific installation and operation of a NOAA system to provide environmental data in a timely manner. Still, there are empirical findings supporting that for particular stakeholders the environmental performance of a port is not irrelevant.

Environmental Issues in Port Competitiveness Paper

You can access environmental permit resolutions issued by the Regional State Administrative Agency through these links: Some industry officials predict dire consequences, such as the development of huge ports in neighboring nations that draw shipping away from the United States and impose significant time and cost penalties on U.

Port development is slow, frustrated by high costs and budget cutbacks at all levels of government, and the waterways-management infrastructure generally lags available technology.

This problem remains; indeed, it is becoming even more pressing. The ISTEA marked the first time that federal transportation policy explicitly recognized intermodal connections as an important topic for planning and infrastructure investments.

Two possible approaches, conceived as a package, are identified here. Freight often is transferred among sea, land, and air carriers.

The ports are finding it easier to continue their planning and expansion programs with the regulatory agencies inwithout the background of public anger. Improving processes for making decisions, undertaking consensus building among stakeholders, and implementing technological advances will help resolve some of these issues.

Responding to societal pressures at local level represents an additional motivation for port investment in environmental initiatives. Nonetheless, the future suggests that there will continue to be regulatory requirements and by not thinking in terms of competitive advantages, ports are missing a business opportunity to improve their competitive position.

In this connection, most studies in the existing literature mainly focus on the environmental aspects of sustainable development and have not clearly explained what sustainable port development exactly entails.From controversial but revolutionary initiatives like our Clean Truck Program, to our numerous efforts to “electrify” the Port in order to reduce fossil fuel consumption and greenhouse gas emissions, the Port of L.A.

Greening transport

is on the forefront of environmental change in the port and maritime industries. This is particularly true of the port industry that has often faced governmental mandates for achieving regulatory compliance, including safety, security or environmental requirements.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Meeting these requirements has been typically perceived as added costs that hamper a port’s efforts to compete in the sea trade marketplace as they drive up the costs of set-vices. Competitiveness in the Garment and Textiles Industry: Creating a supportive environment A CASE STUDY OF BANGLADESH Dr.

Sanchita Banerjee Saxena, We also benefited from valuable information from media reports on RMG issues compiled by PROGRESS (Promotion of social, environmental and production standards in the ready-made. Busan Port Authority (BPA) established the ‘Comprehensive Plan to Establish Green Busan Port’ to address the environmental impacts of port operations inas green performance, including air, marine, and noise pollution management, is regarded as a key sustainability issue for the port.

We understand the many factors that determine the intrinsic quality of a port project, such as regulatory and tariff issues, demand-supply projections, competitiveness, public-private partnerships, environmental planning, and risk related to climate change.

The concept of port sustainability has gained increasing attention and become one of the most important focus areas for improving port competitiveness.

Environmental issues in port competitiveness
Rated 0/5 based on 21 review